Harsh Chopra v. M/ S Maruti Automobiles and 4 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 367/2022 Date: 24.05.2023
Present: Shri Ajay Kumar Patel, Advocate holding brief of Shri Adarsh Bhushan, counsel for the appellant-Auction Purchaser, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 has filed reply to the delay condonation application after serving copy of the same upon the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 seeks 3 days’ time to verify the averment made by the counsel for the appellant, which has been recorded vide order dated 15.03.2023. Let the same be verified and filed the relevant document by the next date.
List this case on 15.09.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090003672022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court