Amneesh Dand v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to conflicting court dates, listing the matter for 06.09.2023 while keeping any interim order operative.
What did the court decide?
Case listed on 06.09.2023 for hearing; interim order remains operative.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 116/2020 Date: 23.05.2023
Present: Shri Satyajeet Mukherjee, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjeev Singh, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Sanjeev Singh is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he could not appear before this Tribunal today and prays for adjournment.
List this case on 06.09.2023 for hearing. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Sanjeev Singh
- respondent
None for the respondent-Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090001162020
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court