Anil Kumar and Another v. Hdfc Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 761/2023 Date: 01.11.2023
Anil Kumar & Anr. Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd.
Present: Shri V. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Himanshu Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has already deposited more than 50% of the amount due.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that 25% of the amount due towards pre-deposit has not yet been deposited. Learned counsel further submits that he has not been served with the copy of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve the same upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank during course of the day, who may respond to the averment of the learned counsel for the appellant that about 50% of the demanded amount has already been deposited.
List this case on 18.01.2024 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kumar & Anr.
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090007612023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court