Aman Khetrapal v. Union Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 638/2023 Date: 28.11.2023
Aman Khetrapal Vs. Union Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Saiyad Sanwar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashwarya Pratap Singh, counsel for the respondent no. 4,
The office report dated 24.11.2023 shows that the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 have been noticed, but the notice sent to the respondent no. 3 has returned back with endorsement “door locked” and no reply has been filed by the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
The served respondents may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 04.03.2024 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Khetrapal
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090006382023
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court