Aman Khetrapal v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal filed against an interim order rejecting a prayer to restrain the bank from taking physical possession of mortgaged property, holding appellants failed to make out prima-facie case.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs; appellants restrained from stopping bank from taking possession.
What the court decided
IN DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD
Appeal Dy No. 123/2023
- Aman Khetrapal S/o Shri Sunil Khetrapal, R/o 3 Auckland Road Prayagraj U.P-211001
- Smt Benu Khetrapal, W/o Shri Sunil Khetrapal, R/o 3 Auckland Road, Prayagraj U.P-211001
- Anuj Khetrapal, S/o Shri Sunil Khetrapal, R/o 3 Auckland Road, Prayagraj U.P-211001
- ……….....……………………...………………………………………………..Appellants
- Versus
- The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, Hotel Samrat Building, 49/25 MG Marg Civil Lines, Prayagraj U.P-211001
- The Union Bank of India, Main Branch, Hotel Samrat Building, 49/25 MG Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad through its Branch Manager
- M/s Greenland (A & M) Corporation, through its partners, R/o 20,MG Marg, Prayagraj-211001
- ……….….………….…….………………………………………………….Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order rejecting the prayer to restrain the bank from taking physical possession of the mortgaged property should be interfered with.
Whether the appellants made out a prima-facie case for granting interim relief pending adjudication on merits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Khetrapal
- appellant
Benu Khetrapal
- appellant
Anuj Khetrapal
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India
- respondent
The Union Bank of India
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court