This order adjourns a regular appeal in which the respondent-Bank requested time to file a reply. The case was listed for a future date to receive that reply.
Case listed on 16.08.2022; time granted to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 44/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 89/2016 Date: 26.04.2022
M/s Savitri Devi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the copy of restoration application has been served today, therefore, he prays for time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 16.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
M/s Savitri Devi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
