This order records the listing of Regular Appeal No. 257/2018. The court noted that the memo of appeal had not been served on the respondent counsel, who was given a deadline to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 257/2018 Date: 26.04.2022
Syndicate Bank Vs. Sarvjeet Kaur & Ors.
Present: Shri Brijesh Kesharwani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ramesh Srivastava along with Shri Krishna Shankar, counsels for the respondent no. 1,
Shri Prashant Kumar Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 2- Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 states that copy of memo of appeal has not been served upon him. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve the same upon the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 within 48 hours, who may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 17.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Syndicate Bank
Sarvjeet Kaur
Auction Purchaser
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
