Shri Rupesh Agrawal and Anr. v. Bank of Maharashtra and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 17/2018 Date: 25.04.2022
Shri Rupesh Agrawal and Anr. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and Anr.
Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate files his vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant, which is taken on record.
None is present on behalf of the respondents, although the name of Shri A. C. Thakur is shown in the cause list, as counsel for the respondent no. 1-Bank.
The office report dated 22.04.2022 shows that no affidavit of service has been filed and no one appears on behalf of the respondent no. 2. The said report further shows that the reply of the respondent no. 1 is on record. Let the affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the counsel for the appellant to authenticate the service upon the respondent no. 2 by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to inform Shri A. C. Thakur, counsel for the respondent no. 1 about the order passed today in writing within 48 hours.
List this case on 22.08.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Rupesh Agrawal
- respondent
Bank of Maharashtra
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court