The Bench recorded that the Bank failed to file replies to a waiver and delay condonation application in a 2016 appeal. The Court directed filing by the next date and listed the case for a future hearing.
Directed respondent-Bank to file replies to waiver and delay condonation applications by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 89/2016 Date: 03.01.2023
M/s Savitri Devi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Akshat Agrawal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 02.01.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank to the waiver application and no delay condonation application has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed, as the appeal is of year 2016.
List this case on 09.01.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent-Bank is required to file replies to a waiver application and a delay condonation application.
Whether the case should be listed for hearing after failure to file the aforementioned applications by the respondent.
M/s Savitri Devi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
