The Tribunal granted two days time to the appellant for substitution of a deceased respondent and adjourned the hearing for the substitution application.
Two days time granted to move appropriate substitution application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 79 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 02 of 2018 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 22.09.2022 | Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Limited … Appellant -Vs- M/s. Sai Krishna Industrial Gases Private Limited & Others … Respondents |
|---|---|
| Ms. Rakhi Purnima Paul, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent |
|
| Mr. Rajdeep Mantha, Learned | |
| Counsel for Respondent No. 3/Auction Purchaser |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant as well as Respondent No. 3 submits that the parties have arrived at settlement.
Record shows that Respondent No. 2, LV Gopal Krishna, has expired. Substitution has yet not been done.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for, and is granted, two days time to move appropriate substitution application and thereafter notices be issued to the proposed LRs who may file objection before the next date of listing.
List on 26th September, 2022 for hearing on the substitution application. The date fixed be intimated to Mr. Nemani Srinivas and Mr. Rajdeep Mantha, Learned Counsel for Respondents.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated: 22nd September, 2022 09/ac
Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Limited
M/s. Sai Krishna Industrial Gases Private Limited
LV Gopal Krishna
Respondent No. 3/Auction Purchaser
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
