Umesh Jethwani & Anr. v. State Bank Of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer Petition dismissed as infructuous because the underlying application has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Transfer Petition No. 02 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 97 of 2018 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.09.2022 Umesh Jethani & Another … Appellants -VsState Bank of India & 6 Others … Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
None for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the application has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the instant Transfer Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd September, 2022 12/ac
Umesh Jethani & Another
State Bank of India & 6 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court