Canara bank v. Shri G. Vijaya and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted time to Appellant for filing a substitution application for Legal Representatives of Respondent No. 1. Adjourned for listing. No substantive disposition.
What did the court decide?
Time granted for filing substitution application; matter adjourned for further listing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 588 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 96 of 2018 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.09.2022 Canara Bank … Appellant -VsGurram Ramesh Reddy … Respondent Ms. Aparajita Ghosh with Ms. Aditi Roy, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Nemni Srinivas, Learned Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that she may be granted some time for moving substitution application for substituting the LRs of Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel, submits that as soon as substitution is carried out, he will file power on behalf of the substituted LRs.
Substitution application be filed with advance copy to Mr. Srinivas.
List on 16th December, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Gurram Ramesh Reddy
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090005882021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court