Appeal against an arbitration reference was dismissed as not maintainable after its condonation of delay application was dismissed on default, by a single judge impersonating the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 262 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A. 273 of 2015 in DRT, Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.09.2022 Dr. Mridul Chandra Gogoi & Another … Appellants -VsUnited Bank of India … Respondent None for Appellant
None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for the parties.
Application No. 351 of 2018, for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is dismissed on default.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 262 of 2018, stands dismissed as not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellants and the Respondent and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd September, 2022 03/ac
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable given the dismissal of the condonation of delay application.
Dr. Mridul Chandra Gogoi
United Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
