Listing order listing the appeal for adjudication on the consolidation of a memorandum of understanding supported by witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 79 of 2019
(Arising out of SA 02 of 2018 in DRT- Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
31.01.2023
Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction & Securitization Co. Ltd., … Appellant -VsM/s. Sai Krishna Industrial Gases Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Ajay Gaggar, ld. Counsel for the appellant. Mr. N. Srinivas, ld. counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
List on 08.02.2023.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a memorandum of understanding has been filed by the appellant which was affirmed by four witnesses. All the persons who affirmed the memorandum of understanding shall appear in Court in person on the date fixed.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed by Mr. N. Srinivas, ld. Counsel, on behalf of respondent no. 1 and 2 is taken on record.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 31 January, 2023 06/pkb
Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction & Securitization Co. Ltd.
M/s. Sai Krishna Industrial Gases Pvt. Ltd.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
