Indian Bank v. Pragna Industries
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 47 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 81 of 2018 in DRT-2, Hyderabad )
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.09.2022 Indian Bank … Appellant -VsPragna Industries & 5 Others … Respondents
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. V.V. Ramanna, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Respondents 1, 2 and 4 is taken on record. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks.
Learned Counsel for the appearing Respondents informs that Respondent No. 3, Mrs. C. Prabhavathi, has expired.
Let steps for substitution be taken. Details of legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No. 3 be provided by Learned Counsel for Respondents to the Learned Counsel for Appellant within a week. Thereafter, Appellant shall move appropriate application within two weeks with notices to the proposed LRs and file Affidavit-of-service within three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indian Bank
- respondent
Pragna Industries & 5 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court