Sri Talari Jarge Kumar and Anr. v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Thin order listing the matter for hearing and directing service of notice to the respondent and filing of opposition. No legal proposition decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 126 of 2021)
(Arising out of O.A. 444 of 2017 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 16.09.2022 | Talari Jarge Kumar & Another … Appellant -Vs- |
|---|---|
| State Bank of India … Respondent |
|
| Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| None for the Respondent |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Let notices be issued to the Respondent again. Affidavit of service be filed within three weeks. Bank may file the opposition within four weeks thereafter.
List on 12th January, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 16th September, 2022 02/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Talari Jarge Kumar & Another
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090001262021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court