The Appellant withdrawn the appeal. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Withdrawal application allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 39 of 2015)
(Arising out of S.A. 327 of 2011 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.09.2022 Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited … Appellant -VsSmt. Mydam Nagarani & 8 Others … Respondents
Mr. Rohit Das with Ms. Kishwar Rahman and Mr. Preetam Majumdar, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 344 of 2022
The present application has been filed praying for withdrawal of the appeal by the Appellant.
In view of the above submission, the I.A., being I.A. 344 of 2022, is allowed and the appeal, being Diary No. 39 of 2015, is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 19th September, 2022 06/ac
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited
Smt. Mydam Nagarani & 8 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
