Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal on diary No. 292/2022. Appellant undertook to cure defects in notice service and carry out fresh notice. Respondents directed to file reply expeditiously. Stay by Gujarat High Court extended till next hearing.
What did the court decide?
Stay granted by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court was extended till the next date. Appellant undertook to cure defects in notice and issue fresh notice. Reply ordered from Respondents.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 310/2022 (Substituted Service)
In
Appeal on Diary No. 292/2022
Between
Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya & Anr. … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda & Ors. … Respondent/s Advocate for Appellant is present.
Mr Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated: 12/10/2022:-
Respondent No. 1, 6, and 7 have appeared.
They shall file their reply expeditiously. Regarding the service of the rest of the Respondents, the Appellant undertakes to cure the defects in the publication of the notice and carry out a fresh notice.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the service defects of notice to respondents can be cured by the appellant undertaking fresh notice and the stay extended.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya & Anr.
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Barroda & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court