Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for condonation of delay was posted due to uncorrected defects. The court directed the appellant to cure the office defects before hearing. Stay granted was extended.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No.292/2022
Between
… Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya &Anr. Appellant/s V/s. The Authorised O fficer, … Respondent/s Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Mr. Gopal Nirba n , i/b M/s S.L. Partners, Advocate for Appellants. Mr Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne& C o ., Advocate for . Respondent No. 1 Ms. Mumtaz K han, i/b Mr. Ritesh Patadia , Advocate for Respondents No s . 6 & 7.
-: Order dated: 03/05/2023:-
Responden t No. 1 has filed a reply on th e application for condonation of d elay, but no reply has been file d for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 w ithin the time of four weeks g ranted. The 1st Respondent has n o objection to the delay being condoned. The applic a tion for condonation of delay is s till at Diary No. and the defects p o inted out by the office have not y e t been cured. The Appell a nt is directed to cure the defects p ointed out by the office, and on c u ring those defects the application shall post before the bench for he a ring.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pareshbhai Virjibhai Bhaliya & Anr.
- respondent
The Authorised Officer
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court