State Bank of India v. Smt Kamlesh Devi Agarwal and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
I.A. 430 & 431 of 2021
in
(Appeal No. 29 of 2019)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 120 of 2017 in DRT, Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.03.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant Bank -vsRatanlal Agarwal … Respondent None for Appellant Bank
None for Respondent
Mr. Atul Agarwal, Learned Counsel for 3rd Party/Auction Purchaser
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-Service filed by the Third Party/Auction Purchaser be taken on record. It appears that notices upon the Appellant Bank and Respondent have been sent by e-mail as well as speed post but the track report, confirming delivery, has not been annexed with the affidavit-of-service; hence it could not be presumed whether service has been effected upon the Appellant Bank and Respondent or not.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Ratanlal Agarwal
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court