Gajjala Jayamma v. Canara Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 242 of 2017)
(Arising out of S.A. 499 of 2013 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.03.2022 Gajalla Jayamma … Appellant Vs. Canara Bank & 2 Others … Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Canara Bank
None for Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Respondent No. 1/Canara Bank files Affidavits-inopposition against applications for waiver as well as for condonation of delay; copies whereof have been served upon Appellant.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. Advance copy be served upon Respondents.
Record reveals, Mr. Surajit Chakraborty, Learned Counsel, appeared by filing Vaklatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 3, though he has not appeared today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gajalla Jayamma
- respondent
Canara Bank
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court