Central Bank of India v. Sarita Sinha and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for hearing in an appeal where respondents deposit may render appeal infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 09/2022 Date: 29.11.2022
Central Bank of India Vs. Sarita Sinha & Ors.
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellants,
Learned counsel for the respondents states that entire amount has been deposited by the respondent nos. 1 & 2, which amount has also been returned to the auction purchaser, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that some issues are still to be addressed, therefore, some date may be fixed.
As prayed by the counsel for the appellant, list this case on 09.01.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Central Bank of India
- respondent
Sarita Sinha
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court