Anju Gupta v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 359/2022 Date: 29.11.2022
Anju Gupta Vs. Punjab National Bank
Present: Shri Sudhanshu Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the copy of memo has not been served upon him.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall serve a copy of memo upon the learned counsel for the respondentbank within 48 hours and also explain regarding maintainability of the appeal in absence of non deposit of predeposit on the next date fixed.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 14.03.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anju Gupta
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090003592022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court