The appeal filed by Central Bank of India was dismissed as infructuous based on a representation that the matter between parties had been settled. The order does not address substantive claims.
The appeal has been dismissed as it has become infructuous due to settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 09/2022 Date: 27.05.2024
Central Bank of India Vs. Sarita Sinha and 2 Ors.
Present: Ms. Ashwini Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri A. K. Pal, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent-Borrower,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore, the withdrawal application has been filed for dismissing the appeal as become infructuous.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Central Bank of India
Sarita Sinha
2 Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
