This court issued directions for serving notice on respondent no. 11 through newspaper publication within a week, listing the matter for service on 24.01.2023. The appeal regarding maintainability was noted but not decided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 08/2014 Date: 14.10.2022
Bank of Baroda Vs. M/s Firozabad Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellantBank,
Shri Brijesh Kumar Kesharwani, counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 6, Ex-parte against the respondents no. 7, 8, 9 & 10,
Learned counsel for the appearing respondents submits that the present appeal is not maintainable in view of the earlier order of this Tribunal dated 19.11.2013, which is appended at page no. 123 of the paper book.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall argue the matter and satisfy the court regarding the said submission made by the respondents.
Let fresh steps be taken for service of notice upon the respondent no. 11 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Steps to be taken within a week. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 24.01.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Bank of Baroda
M/s Firozabad Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
