The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal granted the appellant an extension of time to engage new legal counsel after the appearance of the previous advocate was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 191/2014
Between
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Sumit Pawar, Officer of the Appellant is present in person. Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
-: Order dated: 05/09/2022:-
Advocate, Mr R. L. Motwani, who used to represent Appellant in this matter submits that he will not be appearing for the Appellant and has withdrawn his Vakalatnama.
The Officer appearing for the Appellant Institution seeks further time to engage another lawyer.
Since the earlier counsel is giving up his Vakaltanama, time is granted to the Appellant to engage another lawyer and to get ready for the hearing.
Post on 03.11.2022 for filing Vakalatnama/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-19
1
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
