Per order, the appeal was posted for hearing after the appellant sought time due to a change in vakalatnama.
This order merely conducts procedural formalities. No substantive legal proposition is laid down as the hearing was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 191/2014
Between
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Pegasus Assets R e construction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s tures. Mr. Sanjay Anab h awane, i/b M/s. M & S Legal Ve n Mr Puneet Goga d , Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 16/03/2023:- The Ld. C ounsel appearing for the Appell a nt submits that there is a change of vakalatnama and seeks time to get ready for the hearing.
Post on 15. 0 6.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson rm-26
1
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
