E Star Infotech Ltd. and Anr. v. Union Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant requested further time to engage counsel. Court denied extension and posted matter for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 52/2010
Between
E- Star Infotech Ltd. & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Union Bank of India & Anr.. …Respondent/s
Mr Mahesh Thanvi, Appellant No.2 present in person
Ms Aparna Jagktap, i/b Ms Uma Fadia, Advocate for Respondent No.1
Ms. Sujata Gowalkar, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultants, Advocate for Respondent No.2
-: Order dated: 02/09/2022:-
The second Appellant who is present in person seeks further time to engage the lawyer since the earlier counsel has returned the files to him.
The Respondents are present through their Counsel.
The Appellant is informed that he shall, after engaging in counsel, get ready for hearing positively on the next date. No further time will be granted.
Post on 19.10.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1
E- Star Infotech Ltd.
Union Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court