The Tribunal listed an appeal for hearing after the appellant sought an adjournment asserting impanelment with the first respondent and vow to engage new counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 191/2014
Between
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Shadab Khan, i/b Mr. R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated : 22/06/2022 :-
The Ld. Counsel appearing to the Appellant submits that they have also been impaneled with the first Respondent and therefore, requires to give up Vakalatnama. Hence the adjournment is sought on that ground. The Appellant shall engage another counsel by the next date.
Post on 05.09.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-26
1
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
