Union Bank of India v. Ms Srusti Infotech And Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal stayed orders on an attorney brief return and medical hindrance, directing listing in Hyderabad upon notice to parties and the Registrar. No substantive disposal occurred.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 17 of 2019)
(Arising out of O.A. 67 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.04.2022 Andhra Bank
… Appellant
-vs-
M/s. Shrusti Infotech & Others … Respondent
Mr. Prabir Banerjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank
Mr. Valluri Dattatreya Uma Sanker in person for Respondents/M/s.Shrusti Infotech
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Prabir Banerjee, Advocate-on-record for the Bank, prays for some time to enable him to engage some other Counsel since Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Senior Counsel, who was engaged in the matter, has returned the brief and is not inclined to appear in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Andhra Bank
- respondent
M/s. Shrusti Infotech & Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court