The Appellate Tribunal dismissed Appeal No. 125 of 2016 in default as no party appeared to represent the appellants in the second round of hearing.
Appeal dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 125 of 2016)
(Arising out of O.A. 04 of 2013 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.04.2022 S.M. Power Drives Private Limited & 3 Others … Appellants -vsBank of Baroda & Another … Respondents
None for Appellants
None for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
None appears to represent the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 125 of 2016,
stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Record be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 19th April, 2022 05/ac
S.M. Power Drives Private Limited & 3 Others
Bank of Baroda & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
