Alok Kumarsadhukhan v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
No. Appeal dismissed for default as the appellant did not appear.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy No. 30 of 2021)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 267 of 2015 in DRT-3 Kolkata )
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.12.2022
Alok Kumar Sadhukhan
… Appellant
-Vs-
State Bank of India & Ors.
… Respondent None for the appellant. None for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for the appellant. Appeal Dy. No. 30 of 2021 is dismissed for default.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alok Kumar Sadhukhan
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090000302021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court