Union Bank of India v. M/S Sushila Steels & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal was adjourned to 19.07.2022 for hearing, after repeated delays on both sides, as it was the last opportunity before hearing.
What the court decided
Regular Appeal No. 109/2015 Date: 20.04.2022
Union Bank of India Vs. M/s Sushila Steels & Ors.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ravi Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhishek Tiwari, counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and 7, Shri A. P. Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kaushal Kishore, counsel for the respondent-PNB,
Learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 & 7 states that Shri Abhishek, Advocate is to argue the matter on behalf of the contesting respondents, who comes from Delhi, but he is unable to come today, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
The similar request has been made by Shri A. P. Singh, Advocate, who states that the matter is to be argued by Shri Kaushal Kishore, counsel for the respondent-Punjab National Bank, who could not come from Lucknow today.
The appeal is being adjourned again and again on one pretext or the other. However, in the interest of justice, as last opportunity, list this case on 19.07.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Sushila Steels & Ors.
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court