This order grants the appellant's request to list the regular appeal for hearing on a future date, noting arguments regarding counsel availability and adjournment history.
Case listed for hearing on 24.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 109/2015 Date: 21.11.2022
Union Bank of India Vs. M/s Sushila Steels & Ors.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Amit Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhishek Tiwari, counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 4 and 7, Shri Kaushal Kishor, counsel for the respondent-PNB,
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7 submits that the arguing counsel Shri Abhishek Tiwari is suffering from dengue, therefore, he seeks adjournment.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that mostly the present case is being adjourned on behalf of Shri Abhishek Tiwari on one pretext or the other and the appeal is of year 2015.
As prayed on behalf of Shri Abhishek Tiwari, list this case on 24.01.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Union Bank of India
M/s Sushila Steels & Ors.
Punjab National Bank
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
