Mahesh mihani v. Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 135/2021 Date: 19.04.2022
Mahesh Mihani Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.
Shri V. D. Chauhan, learned counsel for the appellant, as he was then, has been elevated as judge of the Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad, but today Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate appears and files his vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant, which is taken on record.
Shri Alok Rai, Advocate holding brief of Shri Wajid Hyder, counsel for the respondent no. 1 prays for time to file reply.
Shri Anirudh Pandey, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 to 8 and seeks time to file reply along with vakalatnama.
No one appears on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 & 3. Affidavit of service is on record, but there is no tracking report, therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to file tracking report to authenticate that the said respondents have been served.
The appearing respondents may also file their reply by the next date.
List this case on 02.06.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mahesh Mihani
- respondent
Punjab and Sind Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court