In Regular Appeal No. 106/2016, the High Court granted an adjournment party in absentia the reason for non-appearance that the court listed the matter for 12.04.2023 and ordered interim orders to remain operative pending hearing.
Case adjourned to 12.04.2023; interim orders if any, remain operative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 106/2016 Date: 17.01.2023
Shri Om Prakash Tiwari & Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellants, Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the arguing counsel Shri Rakesh Mishra is out of station, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 12.04.2023 for hearing. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Shri Om Prakash Tiwari & Anr.
Union Bank of India & Anr.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
