Mr Kurmala Satyanarayana v. Andhra Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In this interim order, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata recorded filed vakalatnama and affidavits of service. It directed paper publication for service upon a respondent where physical service was incomplete and listed the matter for a future hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 184 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 26 of 2019 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.6.2022
Mr. Kurmala Satyanarayana … Appellant -VsAndhra Bank & 5 Others … Respondent
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Vakalatnama filed Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank be taken on record.
Affidavit-of-service filed be taken on record. Service upon Respondents No. 1, 3, 4 is complete. Respondents No. 5 and 6 refused. Service upon Respondent No. 2 is incomplete.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kurmala Satyanarayana
- respondent
Andhra Bank & 5 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 191090001842021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court