Mr Kurmala Satyanarayana v. Andhra Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants two weeks time to the respondent for filing objections to two applications and takes a supplementary affidavit filed by the appellant on record. The matter was listed for a future date.
What did the court decide?
Time granted for filing objections to IA No. 146 of 2021 and IA No. 147 of 2021.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 184 of 2021)
(Arising out of SA./26 of 2019 in DRT-Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.07.2022
Mr. Kurmala Satyanarayana
… Appellant
-VsUnion Bank of India
… Respondents
Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant.
Mr. S. Pal Choudhuri, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1
Ms. Jayati Choudhury, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kurmala Satyanarayana
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090001842021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court