Devendra Kumar Rai v. State Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Appeal Dy. No. 389/2022, the appellant's counsel reported indisposition of Sr. Advocate and requested adjournment. The respondent-Bank's counsel noted lack of service of appeal copy. The case was listed adjourned for 02.12.2022 for waiver.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 389/2022 Date: 26.09.2022
Devendra Kumar Rai Vs. State Bank of India & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. S. Nigam, Sr. Advocate is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he seeks time.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that he has not been served with the copy of appeal, for which learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve the same during course of the day, who may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 02.12.2022 for waiver.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Devendra Kumar Rai
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
VN Giri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090003892022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court