The Division Bench directed the appellant to serve notices by publication on respondent defendants whom personal notice could not reach. Replies were to be filed by next hearing. The matter was listed for service on 16.12.2022.
Directing service of notice by publication in newspapers for defendants 4, 5, 7, 8 & 11 within 10 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 193/2021 Date: 22.09.2022
Canara Bank Vs. Hasan Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri Utkarsh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
The office report dated 21.09.2022 shows that the notices sent to the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 & 10 have been delivered, but notices sent to the respondent nos. 4, 5, 7, 8 & 11 have not been delivered.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 4, 5, 7, 8 & 11 by publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
The served respondents may file reply by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 16.12.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice should be served by publication on defendants for whom personal service could not be effected.
Canara Bank
Hasan Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent nos. 1 to 11
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
