Canara Bank v. Hasan Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and 10ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of interlocutory matter. Directing respondents to file reply by next date despite non-appearance and pending delay condonation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 193/2021 Date: 14.03.2022
Canara Bank Vs. Hasan Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the affidavit of service has been filed along with tracking report, which shows that the respondents have been noticed, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. The delay condonation application is also pending for consideration. However, the respondents may file reply by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 08.07.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Hasan Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court