The High Court of Delhi extended the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal for six months under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, at the request of the petitioner.
Extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
M/S CENTURY 21 MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Munshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Umang Mehta, Advocate.
versus
M/S BEYOND MALLS LLP .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashwin Rastogi, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 16.09.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2025
Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2025 at 12:24:13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended beyond its expiration date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Century 21 Malls Private Limited
M/s Beyond Malls LLP
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
