Disposed

Nitin Gupta v. Sanjay Singh & Ors.

Delhi HC15 Sept 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/378/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 9 petition seeking interim access to a partnership firm's books of accounts, net banking/GST/TDS login credentials, laptop and office. Respondents consented without prejudice, and the petition was disposed of on that basis.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner given access to firm's records/books of accounts, banking/GST/TDS credentials, laptop and office as conceded by respondents.

Nitin Gupta Vs Sanjay Singh & Ors. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 378/2025 with I.A. 22806/2025

¶4

NITIN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Ms. Rashika Narain and Mr. Vedant Kumar, Advocates. versus

¶5

SANJAY SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.R. Menon, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Kishor Bhandari, Mr. Jaivardhan Jeph, Ms. Nitika Jangir and Mr. Manmeet Singh Saini, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶7

O R D E R % 15.09.2025

¶8

The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking urgent interim reliefs.

¶9

Mr. Samar Bansal, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if he is provided the following:

¶10

i. Online as well as physical access to the records/books of accounts of the partnership firm, M/s ARCOP Associates.

¶11

ii. Login credentials for net banking, GST and TDS of the said firm.

¶12

iii. Laptop of the said firm.

¶13

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 378/2025

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:24:35

¶17

iv. Physical access to the office of the said firm.

¶18

Mr. Manish Vashisht, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the respondents have no objection providing the aforesaid access to the petitioner. This is without prejudice to his contention that all the records/passwords of the aforesaid firm are already available with the petitioner.

¶19

He further submits that the respondents have no difficulty if the petitioner would visit the firm’s office and use the same.

¶20

In view of the above, the present petition, along with pending application, stands disposed of.

¶21

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶22

SEPTEMBER 15, 2025

¶23

Vivek/-

¶24

Page 2 of 2

¶25

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 378/2025

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:24:35

Nitin Gupta v. Sanjay Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Gupta v. Sanjay Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raipur Expressways Limited Vs National Highway Authority of India

Amit Saxena. Vs Nitin Saxena.

Saint Gobain Glass France Vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.

Bio 2 (India) Limited Vs Mrs Sudesh Sinha & Ors.

Klj Polymers and Chemicals Limited Vs Yogesh Gambhir

Government of NCT of Delhi Vs M/S Mps Construction Company