Petition under Section 11(6) sought appointment of an arbitrator for disputes under a lease deed. Noting respondents had filed an eviction suit before the Saket District Courts, the court disposed of the petition, reserving the petitioner's right to object to the suit's maintainability on ground of the arbitration clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
BIO 2 (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Mehta, Advocate
versus
MRS SUDESH SINHA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 15.09.2025
Page 1 of 2
ARB.P. 396/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:02:33
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2025 ds
ARB.P. 396/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:02:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under the arbitration clause in the Lease Deed dated 5 January 2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bio 2 (India) Limited
Mrs Sudesh Sinha & Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
