Petition under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 sought extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate. The Court found no intentional delay in filing, noted proceedings were at final argument stage, and extended the mandate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Mr. Akshay Sapre, Mr. Abhijeet Swaroop and Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advocates. versus
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Shukla and Mr. Shubham Malhotra, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
I.A. 11205/2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 361/2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 361/2025 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:30:49
JYOTI SINGH, J
MAY 06, 2025/shivam
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 361/2025 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:30:49
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator should be extended despite a four-month delay in filing the extension petition after expiry of the prior mandate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Das Construction
Container Corporation of India
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
