M/S Dream Merchant Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Amd Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

This petition is preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of six months.

¶18

Disputes having arisen between the parties in relation to Development/Collaboration Agreement dated 05.05.2014 for developing a Township comprising of residential plots/group housing plots/IT parks/commercial plots and complex/EWS, public and health utilities on Respondents’ land admeasuring 264 Kanal 11 Marla i.e., about 33.06875

¶19

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 369/2025

¶20

Page 1 of 3

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:30:18

¶23

acres, situated at Village Mouja Majra Gurdas, Tehsil and District Rewari, Haryana, Respondents filed a petition under Section 9 of 1996 Act, being O.M.P. (I)(COMM.) 226/2019 for restraining the Petitioner from causing any interference in use, enjoyment or transfer of the land. By order dated 22.07.2019, Court directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of land until further orders. However, the petition was withdrawn by Respondents on 11.01.2022.

¶24

It is stated that thereafter Petitioner filed a petition under Section 9 of 1996 Act being O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 44/2022, which was allowed on 09.02.2022, continuing interim order dated 11.01.2022 passed in the earlier petition and directing the Arbitral Tribunal to be constituted, to treat the petition as an application under Section 17 of 1996 Act. Disputes were referred to Delhi International Arbitration Centre (‘DIAC’) and a Sole Arbitrator was appointed. It is stated in the petition that after the mandate was extended by this Court from time to time, proceedings have progressed considerably before the Sole Arbitrator and are at the stage of final arguments, for which dates of 16.05.2025 and 19.05.2025 have been fixed by the learned Arbitrator.

¶25

Issue notice.

¶26

Mr. Vidit Gupta, learned counsel for the Respondents accepts notice and on instructions, submits that the Respondents have no objection to the extension of mandate of the learned Arbitrator.

¶27

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and considering that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of final arguments, mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of six months from 07.05.2025 and since the mandate has expired on 03.04.2025, period between 04.04.2025 to

¶28

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 369/2025

¶29

Page 2 of 3

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:30:18

¶32

06.05.2025 is regularised.

¶33

Petition is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms

¶34

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶35

MAY 7, 2025 S.Sharma

¶36

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 369/2025

¶37

Page 3 of 3

¶38

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:30:18

M/S Dream Merchant Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Amd Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Dream Merchant Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Amd Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Das Construction Vs Container Corporation of India

Rccivl-Litl (Jv) Vs Union of India

Multani Lal Chugh Vs Rajan Elwadhi HUF through Karta Shri Rajan Elwadhi & Anr.

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. through Its Authorized Signatory Col Retd S N P Singh Vs Managing Director Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

M/S Pragati Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Capital Region Transport Corporation Ltd.

M/S Athaang Dichpally Tollway Private Limited Vs the National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Rajesh Sharma Vs Grace Welfare Education Society and Ors.

Energy Efficiency Services Limited Vs National Small Industries Corporation Limited & Ors.

Jagwati (Senior Citizen) Vs M/S Tdi Infrastructure Ltd.

Rakesh Kumar Jindal Vs Manju Mehta

M/S Das Construction Vs Container Corporation of India

Meenu Vs Roshani & Ors.

Cfm Asset Reconstruction Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

M/S C. Parkashan and Co. Vs Govt. of NCT Delhi