Disposed

Meenu v. Roshani & Ors.

Delhi HC7 May 2025CS(OS)/12/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Partition suit over land in Village Bharthal, Dwarka was settled through court-annexed mediation. The court found the settlement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025, directing the Registry to draw up the decree sheet and disposing of the suit.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025; decree sheet directed.

Meenu Vs Roshani & Ors. — Partition | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 12/2019

¶4

MEENU .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Tomar, Advocate. versus

¶6

ROSHANI & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kartik Dabas, Advocate for D-1, 2 and 5.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶9

O R D E R % 07.05.2025

¶10

This suit has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff for a decree of partition in respect of suit land measuring 533.33 sq. yards, being part of Khata/Khatoni No. 38/36, Khasra No. 498 min (1-12), situated in extended Lal Dora of Village Bharthal, Dwarka, Delhi amongst other reliefs.

¶11

During the pendency of the present suit, parties were referred before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre to explore the possibility of amicable settlement vide order dated 10.01.2025, where they have settled all their inter se disputes and Settlement Agreement 25.04.2025 has been executed, incorporating the terms of settlement, which is placed on record.

¶12

In view of the settlement, learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement.

¶13

Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶16

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:03:01

Page 1 of 2

CS(OS) 12/2019

lawful.

Accordingly, suit is decreed in terms of the settlement incorporated in the Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025, which shall form part of the decree and the terms incorporated therein shall bind the parties thereto.

¶21

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.

¶22

Suit is disposed of.

JYOTI SINGH, J

MAY 7, 2025

S.Sharma

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶28

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:03:01

¶29

Page 2 of 2

¶30

CS(OS) 12/2019

Meenu v. Roshani & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meenu v. Roshani & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nangia Construction(I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Telecommunication Consultants & Anr.

Ajay Kishore Sharma Vs Vijay Kishore Sharma & Ors.

Smt Jaspal Kaur & Anr. Vs Tripat Pal Singh

Kanwar Surjeet Singh and Anr. Vs Daljit Singh Pal and Ors.

Pankaj Jain Vs Jitender Jain (Huf) & Ors.

Capital Urjatech Limited & Ors. Vs Jagat Overseas & Ors.

Mr. Rajesh Jain Vs Mr. Jitender Jain & Ors.

Sawan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Ashok Kumar & Ors.

Jagwati (Senior Citizen) Vs M/S Tdi Infrastructure Ltd.

Rakesh Kumar Jindal Vs Manju Mehta

M/S Das Construction Vs Container Corporation of India

M/S Dream Merchant Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Amd Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Cfm Asset Reconstruction Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

M/S C. Parkashan and Co. Vs Govt. of NCT Delhi