Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition requiring summons filing without arrest, leaving parties rights open.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all grounds and contentions before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Mr. Manan Wadhwa, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advs. Mr. Abhinav Bjaja, AAG, Mr. Saksham Ojha, Ms. Geetashi Chandna, Mr. Fandon Priya, Advs. for R-2 and 3 with ACP Joginder Singh, SI Lal Chand, PS S. B. Diary.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
13.11.2025
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2025
Pallavi
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2025 at 12:32:35
Rohit Chikhara
The State NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
