Disposed¶23

Tehseem v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Sept 2025CONT.CAS(C)/1317/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, CONT.CAS(C) 1317/2025, AMIT SHARMA J, order dated 10.09.2025. Contempt petition (Article 215 Constitution; Ss. 11-12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971) by Tehseem v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors. for alleged non-compliance with order dated 06.05.2025 in W.P.(C) 2722/2024 directing MCD action against unauthorized construction (sealed 25.10.2024; ATMCD appeal pending; demolition fixed 14.05.2025). MCD reported compliance on 03.09.2025 - property sealed, construction substantially demolished. Petition disposed of; no further directions. No precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

None; petition disposed of, no further directions required. ¶23

Tehseem Vs Ashwani Kumar & Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1317/2025

¶4

TEHSEEM .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Monish Ali Khan, Mr. Irfan Firdous, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

ASHWANI KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC for UOI. Mr. Abhinav Singh, Adv. forGNCTD. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Mr. Shivam Takiar and Mr. Prateek Dhir, Advs. Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for MCD.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 10.09.2025

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

CONT.CAS(C) 1317/2025

¶13

The present contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks following prayers:-

¶14

“a) Issue directions to summon the Respondent/Contemnor No.1 to appear in person and punish them by initiating proceedings under Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971, for wilful defiance/disobedience of the order dated 06.05.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.(C) 2722/2024; b) Direct the contemnors to forthwith undertake and complete the demolition of the unauthorized construction at the subject premises and submit a detailed compliance report before this Hon’ble Court within a time-bound schedule

¶15

c) Pass any other order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 11:52:27

¶17

fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

¶18

3. Vide Order dated 06.05.2025, in W.P.(C) 2722/2024, it was observed and directed as under:-

¶19

“5. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), submits that, with respect to the property in question, a statutory appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (“ATMCD”), has been filed, which is pending. He further submits that since there was no stay granted by the learned ATMCD, sealing action was taken by the MCD on 25th October, 2024, and that the property in question is lying sealed since then. He further submits that the demolition action is also fixed in the propertyfor14th May, 2025.

¶20

Attention of this Court has also been drawn to the order dated 23rd February, 2024, wherein, the submissions of the owner/occupier of the property in question, has been recorded stating that the petitioner is a habitual complainant. Further, no formal notice was also issued in the present matter.

¶21

Considering the submissions made before this Court, this Court is satisfied that the MCD has already initiated action against the property in question. This Court takes note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the MCD that the property in question, is lying sealed, since 25th October,2024. Accordingly, it is directed that the MCD shall take the requisite action against the unauthorized construction in accordance with law, subject to any orders that may be passed by the learned ATMCD.”

¶22

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD submits that further action in terms of the aforesaid order have been taken on 03.09.2025 and the entire property is lying sealed and unauthorized construction have been substantially demolished.

¶23

In view of the above, no further directions are required, the petition stands disposed of.

¶24

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶25

SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/ sds/dj

¶26

Tehseem v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tehseem v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajender Kumar Vs Rinku Dagar & Ors.

Ms. Yashtee (Minor) & Anr. Vs Sh. Himanshu Gupta

Vipul Kumar Vs Shikha

M/S Gunjan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Asha Kedarnath Gupta

Mrs Harinder Sachdev Vs Dr Nikhil Sinha & Anr. & Ors.

Malkhan Vs Arun Kumar Jha & Anr.

Pancha Devi Vs Arun Kumar Jha & Anr.

Munni Lal Vs Arun Kumar Jha

Rajender Kumar Vs Rinku Dagar & Ors.

Akram Khan Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ms. Yashtee (Minor) & Anr. Vs Sh. Himanshu Gupta

Dinesh Rana Vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation and Ors.

Central Board of Trustee Vs United Coffee House

Sh Satish Mann Vs Sh Rakesh Dass and Ors.