Disposed¶24

Central Board of Trustee v. United Coffee House

Delhi HC10 Sept 2025W.P.(C)/13670/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Central Board of Trustee v. United Coffee House, W.P.(C) 13670/2025 (& CM APPL. 56060/2025), High Court of Delhi, Amit Sharma, J., order dated 10.09.2025. Challenge to CGIT order dated 12.06.2025 in Appeal no. D-1/60/2022 under Articles 226/227; prayer restricted to waiver of Rs. 10,000/- cost imposed by CGIT; cost set aside; petition disposed of. Keywords: CGIT, cost waiver, industrial tribunal appeal, writ jurisdiction, Rs. 10,000/-.

What did the court decide?

The cost of Rs. 10,000/- imposed on the petitioner by the learned CGIT in the impugned order dated 12.06.2025 was set aside; the petition otherwise stands disposed of in those terms. ¶24

Central Board of Trustee Vs United Coffee House — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13670/2025

¶4

CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEE

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Kaushik Kr. Shukla, Advocate.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNITED COFFEE HOUSE .....Respondent

¶9

Through: Mr. Sauhardya Biswas, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 10.09.2025

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

W.P.(C) 13670/2025&CM APPL. 56060/2025

¶14

The present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeks the following prayers:

¶15

“A. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the order dated 12.06.2025 in Appeal no. D-1/60/2022,

¶16

B. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) to stay the operation of the order dated 12.06.2025 in Appeal no. D- 1/60/2022,

¶17

C. Pass any other Writ/order or directions which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary to be passed on the basis of facts and circumstances.”

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he is restricting his prayer in the present petition with respect to the waiver of the cost of Rs. 10,000/- imposed by learned CGIT by way of the impugned order. It is further submitted that the application seeking stay was filed on account

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:10:01

¶21

of legal advice and in these circumstances, it is submitted that the cost as imposed by learned CGIT may be set aside.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the impugned order was passed in the peculiar circumstances of the present case and the cost imposed by the learned CGIT is justified.

¶23

In totality of the facts and circumstances, only the directions for the cost imposed on the petitioner for Rs. 10,000/- is set aside.

¶24

The petition stands disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

¶25

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/ sds

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:10:01

Central Board of Trustee v. United Coffee House

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Central Board of Trustee v. United Coffee House

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahil Paliwal Vs Union of India and Others

Union of India Vs IC-44476M Col Laxmi Chand Dahiya(Retd)

Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 19 (1), New Delhi & Anr.

Ankit Kalra Vs the Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.

M/S Bhagmal and Sons Vs Sales Tax Officer / Avato & Ors.

Mrs Shashi Garg Vs Union of India through Secretary, Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance, Government of India &

Dileep G Vs Union Public Service Commission & Ors.

Isht Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Rajender Kumar Vs Rinku Dagar & Ors.

Akram Khan Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ms. Yashtee (Minor) & Anr. Vs Sh. Himanshu Gupta

Tehseem Vs Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Dinesh Rana Vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation and Ors.

Sh Satish Mann Vs Sh Rakesh Dass and Ors.